You agree? Then perhaps you should remove this from your profile:
No one can kill another, except in self-defense, and be an Anarchist, because that would be invading another's equal right to live - the antithesis of Anarchism.
Hence assassins and criminals generally are called Anarchists only by the ignorant and malicious.
You can't be an Anarchist and do the things which Anarchism condemns.
~ Joseph A. Labadie
Saddam is no threat to anyone, therefore killing him would not be in self-defense. So how can you support it?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ayoub![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-30 06:16 am (UTC)No one can kill another, except in self-defense, and be an Anarchist, because that would be invading another's equal right to live - the antithesis of Anarchism.
Hence assassins and criminals generally are called Anarchists only by the ignorant and malicious.
You can't be an Anarchist and do the things which Anarchism condemns.
~ Joseph A. Labadie
Saddam is no threat to anyone, therefore killing him would not be in self-defense. So how can you support it?